Bearing gifts
The triumph of Three Kings and American Beauty
by Peter Keough
'American Beauty'
|
Another summer, another record box office for Hollywood. Which begs the
question, who goes to these movies? Do people gush over Runaway Bride
and recommend it to their friends? Do they ponder the deeper meaning of Deep
Blue Sea and buttonhole strangers to debate it? Even the ever voluble
Star Wars fans have been suspiciously reticent about The Phantom
Menace, which is now cruising in on a half-billion-dollar gross. With few
exceptions (The Blair Witch Project and The Sixth Sense, of which
more later), it's been a summer, a whole year, of vapid time killers that have
made a lot of money. For people like myself who have to come up with a 10 Best
list of some credibility, things have been looking desperate.
It's always that way, of course, though perhaps even more so this year than
ever before. Summer brings despair, and then in the fall the 12-year-old boys
who are the studios' target audience go back to school, returning the screens
to grown-ups. As the leaves turn gold, so do Hollywood's ambitions, and the
studios pack the autumn release slate with Oscar hopefuls.
But there is something a little different going on this time around with the
release of Sam Mendes's American Beauty and David O. Russell's Three
Kings. People are leaving these films not just satisfied that at last
they've seen a good picture; they're leaving transformed. These movies don't
merely justify the $7.75 spent on a ticket -- they actually vindicate
commercial cinema as an art form. Maybe it's just the long wait between
worthwhile films. Or is there something divine in that plastic bag blowing in
the wind in the home video at the heart of American Beauty? In that
scene and others in both pictures -- the notorious shot of a bullet passing
through living viscera in Three Kings is one -- audiences get that
thrill that only the best movies offer, a glimpse at what has never been seen
before, or at something that has been seen many times but never quite this
way.
Which is completely contrary to the way business-as-usual operates in
Hollywood. High concept (its dominating principle) dictates, as Steven
Spielberg once proclaimed, that any film that can't be described in 10 words or
less is not worth making. After American Beauty and Three Kings,
however, any film that can be described at all might not seem worth seeing.
Not that they are strictly original. One could spend a diverting afternoon
coming up with all the movies Three Kings is derivative of -- they'd
range from M*A*S*H and The Wild Bunch to Kelly's Heroes
and The Three Amigos. As for the punctured American dream and the
underside of a wholesome suburban paradise that seem such fresh revelations in
American Beauty, they were old verities already when Mike Nichols
brought them to the screen in The Graduate.
I remember my feelings when I first saw The Graduate, more than three
decades ago, and they were not unlike those I experienced with Beauty.
True, some of my responses to the earlier film might have been due to the
addled hormonal state of a repressed 13-year-old who was getting a gander,
however fleeting, at Anne Bancroft's tits. But it was also due, I believe, to
the excitement of a new way of looking at things, of a resurgence in creativity
that shook off the old and moribund and embraced a world where everything could
be changed and everything was possible.
'Three Kings'
|
Well, maybe it was just Anne Bancroft's tits. Neither do I think that
Beauty and Kings will usher in a new '60s-style renaissance in
film (though an enticing number of extraordinary new films are to open before
the end of the year -- see sidebar). Rather, these are just the latest
additions to a canon of resonant films that have sprung up unexpectedly from
time to time, zeitgeist-gripping strokes of genius that confront with
innovative style and insight old, irresolvable dilemmas.
They aren't necessarily great or even good films -- at least in my judgment --
but they all qualify because in one way or another they baffled the experts at
marketing and promotion with their success and then foiled most efforts to
imitate them. Like The Graduate, they weren't contrived out of the
reliable generic parts of the studio assembly line; instead they tapped
directly into the cultural collective unconscious. In the past decade, that
canon would include films like Forrest Gump (1995) and Life Is
Beautiful (1998), though I myself found both inane and insidiously
sentimental. More to my taste have been The Crying Game (1993), The
Piano (1994), and Pulp Fiction (1995). On the fringe can be
considered Fargo (1997) and, to give Mr. High Concept his due,
Schindler's List (1993); and in the category of those that missed out
for reasons unknown I'd include Rushmore and The Truman Show.
Films from earlier this year (suggesting the profound summer drought brought on
an earlier fall than usual) that might make the grade would include The
Blair Witch Project and The Sixth Sense.
These movies shattered the inertia and preconceptions of audiences, allowing
them to see the world and the cinema with new eyes. They also had some specific
themes in common. Call it gender bias (or maybe the buzz from Susan Faludi's
new Stiffed), but they all seem to me preoccupied with a crisis in the
male role and image (certainly that was the case for me back with The
Graduate). In Forrest Gump and Life Is Beautiful, the
traditional model of a man as agent of his own destiny is usurped by the
inexorability of history and the fact that the guys are idiots. In The
Crying Game, the traditional role of male as romantic hero and chivalric
knight is undermined by the fact that the damsel in distress is another man. In
Pulp Fiction, the male hero is undone because the generic conventions he
follows no longer apply; in The Piano, it's the social convention of men
as owners and women as property that's been transcended.
So, too, in Beauty and Kings -- and in The Blair Witch
Project and The Sixth Sense, though these two films might be too
gimmicky to endure as icons -- men have found their roles and purposes suddenly
meaningless and impotent. Like an older Benjamin Braddock in The
Graduate, Kevin Spacey's white-collar drone in American Beauty and
George Clooney's obsolete war hero in Three Kings realize that all
they've worked for and desired has been illusory. Both rebel by turning to a
forbidden object of desire -- an underage nymphet in Beauty, stolen gold
in Kings. In their struggle to attain these taboo desires, however, they
gain instead a kind of enlightenment, a new vision. And so do we.
In both films, the heroes' redemption comes through the intervention of some
variation of the film medium itself, and (more important) through the help of a
woman. In Kings, Clooney's cynical quest for gold gathers unexpected
baggage, and not just of the Louis Vuitton kind. Rather than allow a slaughter
of innocents, Clooney seeks out an alliance with the formerly disdained female
CNN correspondent, threatening to put a true image of the Gulf War before the
eyes of a public bamboozled by the government-controlled media (significantly,
Clooney's character seeks future employment in the entertainment industry). In
Beauty, Spacey's notion of the title concept is Mena Suvari's nubile,
willing Lolita complete with cascades of rose petals; it's an adolescent
fantasy that evaporates even as he embraces it.
Compare it to the vision perceived by his alter ego, the teenage drug dealer
next door played by Wes Bentley. Like the hero of Steven Soderbergh's 1989
sex, lies and videotape, another film that, for better or worse, changed
the way we look at things, Bentley's oddball seeker is obsessed with recording
epiphanies, and the most beautiful and ineffable is that plastic bag dancing in
the wind. Unlike Spacey, Bentley shares this beauty with someone else, a woman
(in fact Spacey's estranged daughter), and so achieves the reconciliation of
the sexes that is one of the cinema's main functions, however illusory. He also
shares it with us, and that may be the movies' and art's most important
function of all: discovering the beauty in the overlooked and commonplace and
allowing us to recognize it.
Sleeping beauties?