Complex world
Eliza Anderson examines the 'small questions'
by Bill Rodriguez
The first play of Eliza Anderson's that I saw, back in 1989,
left me impressed and shaken. The Lower Rooms dealt with a torture
victim but it traded in its potential pathos for unflinching clarity, venting all accumulating rage through a girl going through
adolescence, a time of figurative torment. The workshop production was by one
of Paula Vogel's students in Brown's graduate creative writing program, and it
went on to be staged at the Kennedy Center in Washington. I could only hope
that the young playwright would muster the gumption, and perhaps the masochism,
to stick with this usually thankless profession. I wanted to see more of what
she could do.
Now, more than a decade later, Trinity Repertory Company is staging the world
premiere of Anderson's The New England Sonata, through April 14.
The story it tells is a typically intense one for the playwright. Former
company member Amy Van Nostrand returns in the role of Clara, a poet who lives
with fellow writer and husband Wallace (Timothy Crowe) in a rural New England
farmhouse. Their life of the mind is interrupted by a crisis of the body, as
one of them is discovered to have a fatal illness. Their relationship and
everything else comes under newly intense scrutiny, complicated by the arrival
of one of their mothers (Barbara Meek) and Clara's meeting an unfettered young
squatter (Andy Macdonald) in her woods.
As it happens, the Maine-raised playwright settled in Rhode Island after
Brown, so we have all the chance to see her work over the years. She was the
1991 New England Clauder Playwriting Competition winner, which brought The
Water Principle to Trinity before it went on to five other theaters, from
Cleveland to LA. Her historically-based Mill Girls, commissioned by the
local All Children's Theatre in 1999, has been staged frequently to fascinated
community response. Several plays, mostly short one-acts, have been produced at
Perishable Theatre. Of them, what most impressed me were two plays that threw
together characters with opposite points of view, to see what the psychological
sparks might ignite: In The Exchange, a pair of Christian proselytizers
are let into the home of a forthright lesbian. In That All of Us Should Be
Fed, an independent spinster in a seacoast town before World War I invites
to tea a dour but neighborly woman.
The recipient of several playwriting awards, fellowships, and residencies,
Anderson currently teaches playwriting at Trinity Repertory Conservatory and
has taught at the University of Rhode Island and Rhode Island College, as well
as at workshops in Boston and elsewhere.
Anderson is sitting over a cardboard cup of coffee in a café near
Trinity, taking a break from rehearsal. What, I ask her, does she give for a
quick summary when people ask what this play is about?
"My little quip is that this play is about creativity, spirituality, and
mortality -- the small questions in life," she replies with a light laugh.
"That, indeed, is what this play is about for me. And that's what I want to
investigate."
Fortunately, Trinity and director Amanda Dehnert are more than comfortable
with that sort of psyche-snooping, which makes for intensely involving theater
when it works, self-indulgence when it doesn't. The structure Anderson has
devised for the play has plenty of elbow room for exploration. The sonata of
the title is more than metaphorical, since the play was organized to parallel
that musical form, with themes emerging and pulling back, concluding with a
sort of recapitulating coda. That has allowed Anderson to not lock in her
approaches as she has shaped the themes.
"I've never done this kind of rewriting before," she says. "With the
traditionally plot-driven play, you don't have the luxury of this kind of
rewriting, because once you decide where the plot points are and you remove one
of the plot points, you are removing one of the pillars of the play and the
house falls down. It's that kind of thing."
The rehearsal we'd just stepped out of demonstrated yet another level of
choices. I remark on how Van Nostrand was delving into the character, in a
scene where Clara doesn't want her husband to comfort her. The actor's choice
was to withdraw into anger, but the words on the page would have as
convincingly allowed abject fear, or even denial.
Anderson is amused by that example. "It's a tremendous leap of faith for a
writer to write something so open in that way. I'm relying on the
interpretation of the director, relying on the impulses of the actors, I'm
relying on the generosity of spirit in the room to see the play through. Every
production of this play could eventually be hugely different," she explains.
"What I've tried to capture is the complexity of us -- and by us I mean all of
us."
It helps that she has, as she puts it, a great faith in actors. "I'm still in
the theater only because of actors, I must say. I love actors. I love that time
onstage when everything is unfolding and I don't know where I am any longer, in
terms of me, my person, because I am so involved in that, I'm so swept up in
that.
"That to me is theater. And no, it doesn't happen all the time. But we can
always reach for the ideal. And that's what I choose to do with my time, reach
for the ideal. And if I reach it -- it's pure gravy. And I can only do
that through these people who are willing to take so seriously my craft and
embody and make manifest these things."
She had started out our conversation declaring that she was tired and not
likely to be a satisfactory interview subject. But by now the playwright is as
enthralled by the subject as any audience member caught up in a drama. She
thinks about opening night, the world premiere of a play she is proud of.
"If the actors find the source of these people, it will be a dynamite night of
theater. I mean dynamite. People will be like . . . " and Anderson
slackens her jaw, gapes and whispers: " 'Wow! What a play!'
"And it's not going to be because of my play, it's going to be because of the
performance of my play and the director," she is quick to add.