G forces
Garth Brooks, country's biggest deal
by Matt Ashare
The year was 1991. And, as we all remember, the pop world was in for one of
those periodic shake-ups that would thrust a new group of artists into the
spotlight, whether they liked it or not. In many ways the change would come to
be embodied by one young man who released his second album that year and,
thanks to a new computerized system of measuring CD sales, rode it to the top
of the Billboard album chart. He'd grown up listening to Kiss albums in
the middle of nowhere, USA, far from the media centers of LA and NYC. But his
music would alter the sound of radio and his clothes the look of fashion in
those cities, and he'd quickly be cast into the role of an American pop icon.
If you're part of a loud and particularly visible minority segment of American
music consumers -- the demographic that reads this paper -- there's a good
chance Kurt Cobain is the name that's popped into your head. If not -- if
you're part of the much larger demographic that regularly tunes into the
country's dominant radio format -- then you know I'm talking about Garth
Brooks.
Both Kurt and Garth released their debut albums in 1989, and each did well
enough to set the wheels in motion for a major breakthrough two years later.
Both artists gave voice to the hopes, dreams, fears, and frustrations of large
segments of the population that hadn't been actively spoken for; each went on
to challenge the industry's ruling hierarchies. But whereas Kurt was crippled
by having to wrestle with the tension between mass success and anti-commercial
punk ideology that was so much a part of his musical heritage, Garth acted as
if he had no such issues to contend with. In contemporary country music there
isn't supposed to be any conflict between artistic integrity and economic
prosperity -- they're simply two sides of the same lucky coin. Heads, Garth
wins; tails, Garth wins. Indeed, as NPR contributor and New Yorker and
New York Times music writer Bruce Feiler details in his fascinating new
Dreaming Out Loud: Garth Brooks, Wynonna Judd, Wade Hayes, and the Changing
Face of Nashville (Avon Books, 406 pages, $24), Brooks's massive marketing
coups have actually strengthened his artistic standing, to the extent that he's
helped bring a new level of commercial clout and prosperity to country music as
a whole.
Brooks's latest triumph is The Limited Series, a competitively priced
boxed set comprising his first six albums, each with 11 tracks rather than the
Nashville standard 10. (He also broke with Music Row convention last year by
including a whopping 14 tracks on his long-delayed seventh album,
Sevens.) The extra cuts in The Limited Series were all recorded
during the sessions for their respective albums, and they're more or less
gratuitous inclusions (including the Bob Dylan tune "To Make You Feel My Love,"
which is also on the Hope Floats soundtrack). But as has been the case
so often in Brooks's career, The Limited Series has ingeniously been
framed as a something of a challenge to his fans -- an opportunity for them to
demonstrate their loyalty. Because when you buy the set, you're helping to push
Brooks -- already the best-selling country artist and solo artist of all time,
with more than 60 million units moved -- closer to his ultimate goal of
overtaking the Beatles to become the best-selling act of all time. The strategy
is working: the set debuted at #1 on the Billboard album chart four
weeks ago, only the second box set in history to do so (Bruce Springsteen's
Live, 1975-1985 was the first). And since each box represents six
SoundScanned CDs and there are exactly two million on the market, well, you do
the math -- yeah, 12 million.
Of course, if, like me, you're one of those people who was too caught up in
the goings on in Seattle and the rest of the alternative nation to pay much
attention to Brooks's ascent, then The Limited Series is a conveniently
packaged catch-up kit. Other than hearing Brooks hits like "Friends in Low
Places" on the radio every now again (usually as a passenger in my mom's car),
catching bits of gossip about any of a number of his feuds with the folks at
Capitol Nashville (the label formerly known as Liberty), and seeing the
occasional concert footage of a puffy-faced Brooks crammed into a pair of
ridiculously tight Wranglers and wearing that big old Stetson and that
high-tech headset microphone like some space-age cowboy preparing to ride off
into orbit around the sunset, I was a Brooks neophyte until three weeks ago.
But getting to know him through his music -- at least the Brooks mythologized
in and by his songs -- is reasonably easy because, well, you just don't sell 60
million albums without making music that's universally accessible and
delivering it in such a way that listeners can effortlessly identify and
empathize with the performer. And that, more than anything, is Brooks's talent.
It's the kind of skill or gift a good politician possesses. Like Ronald Reagan,
Brooks claims John Wayne as his favorite American hero -- and when he discusses
this with Bruce Feiler in Dreaming Out Loud, you get the sense that,
like Reagan, he doesn't distinguish very well between the person John Wayne and
the characters Wayne played in his films. But where Reagan was a simple
character actor good-naturedly walking through all of his roles, whether he was
playing the hero or the villain, Brooks, like Bill Clinton, is a Method man.
Brooks and Clinton both want you to feel their pain, and they want you to know
that they feel yours, too. Brooks shares Clinton's obsessive appetites for food
(he's constantly battling a weight problem) and women (he tearfully confessed
his infidelities on TNN back in '89 and then renewed his vows with his wife,
Sandy) -- as well as the president's ability to turn these personal character
flaws into assets for his public persona.
Beneath the sensitive-guy facade, however, lies one of the most powerful
artists in the music business, one who's proven particularly ruthless in his
dealings with his label. As Feiler reports, Brooks went to war with label head
Jimmy Bowen, and he might well have gotten Bowen fired if Bowen hadn't been
diagnosed with lymphoma in 1994 and decided to resign. During all this, in
1993, Brooks negotiated for himself what some have characterized as a better
deal than just about any other artist in the world has -- one estimated to be
worth $300 million, and giving him complete control over every aspect of when,
where, and how his albums are released. Last year he engaged Bowen's
replacement, Scott Hendricks, in a public battle of wills, and he actually held
up the release of Sevens for three months, until Hendricks was replaced
by more or less by a man of Brooks's choosing, Pat Quigley. Few if any artists
have that kind of power.
The most illuminating and engrossing parts of Feiler's book, which examines
Nashville in the '90s through the wide-angle lenses of three very different
artists (Brooks, Wynonna Judd, and the lesser-known Wade Hayes), come when the
author explains that his subjects -- even Brooks -- are essentially products of
the times and the changes in Nashville and the music business. The implications
are alarming, not just for the future of Nashville but for the industry as a
whole. For example, though the introduction of SoundScan has rationalized the
way CD sales are reported, it's also put more pressure on labels to generate
pre-release hype and airplay for CDs in order to ensure a strong debut on the
album sales charts. The result has been an escalation in the promotion wars
that has significantly inflated the cost of releasing a major-label Nashville
CD. As recently as 1980, moving 100,000 units was a success; in the '90s you
need at least three times that number to break even.
An even more detrimental force has been the proliferating use of
market-research companies by radio stations and labels to choose singles and
determine the make-up of playlists. As more and more radio stations have been
bought up by giant corporations looking to get an immediate return on their
investments, programming those stations has become less of an art and more of a
science designed to keep the largest number of listeners tuned in until the
next commercial break. To serve that need, companies like Marketing/Research
Associates have stepped in with polling data that suggests which singles will
"work" best on radio. Unfortunately, the songs that generate the most
enthusiasm in the polling also tend to generate negative responses from some
potential listeners -- those who would likely switch to another station if they
heard it on the air. So singles that generate consistently middling responses
-- not too hot or too cold -- tend to be chosen over the kind of songs that
people feel passionate about.
Feiler watches and reports as this logic is applied with disastrous results to
a crucial sophomore album by Wade Hayes. The label services radio with a single
everyone, even Hayes, agrees is one of the disc's weaker cuts -- because it
tests well. Sure enough, it's the number one most-added single on radio the
week the album is released. But even after all that effort the album sells
poorly, presumably because people aren't that enthusiastic about the single
they're hearing on the radio. They don't turn the dial, but they don't head for
the record store, either.
Ultimately, Brooks and every other mainstream country artist has had to
contend with some incarnation of this problem -- namely, how to balance the
desire to appeal to the largest number of listeners against the need to make
music with substance and meaning. It's really not all that different from the
prickly predicament Kurt Cobain faced in the wake of Nirvana's chart-topping
success. Cobain apparently decided he was willing to sell fewer albums in order
to maintain a degree of integrity. And certain country artists -- notably Steve
Earle and Waylon Jennings -- have made similar sacrifices. But for a performer
with the ambition of Garth Brooks -- a performer who depends on being able to
boast, McDonald's style, that he's got 60 million sold -- catering to the
lowest common denominator has become the cost of doing business in the '90s.
"The best quote I ever heard about country music these days," Feiler quotes
bluegrass musician Marty Stuart as saying, "is that the reason Long John
Silver's outsells Uncle Bud's Catfish Cabin on the edge of town is because
they've made fish succeed in not tasting like fish."