Battle of the bulge
Gay men suffering from impotence fight homophobia
-- and their own fears -- in the quest for treatment
by Jody Ericson
If Leonard Reynolds had it to do over again, if he could turn back 15
years of agony and humiliation, he never would have told his doctors at Harvard
Pilgrim Health Care in Providence that he is gay. Suffering from sexual
impotence, Reynolds* says that once he outed himself to his doctors, they
assumed his problems were psychological and dismissed such physiological causes
as a leaky vein or blocked artery.
As a result, Reynolds says, he has never known the pleasure of a satisfying,
intimate relationship. Instead, his sex life has been a series of apologies and
excuses, a pile of tossed-aside products -- vacuum pumps, tension rings,
injections -- in the never-ending quest for an erection. Even crueler, when a
health-care company began testing a promising new drug for impotence, Reynolds
was barred from participating because he is gay (see "Clinical trials and
tribulations" page 9).
"In this particular case, I do not know for sure what comes first -- his
homosexuality or his psychological background," wrote Dr. Jacques Susset, a
clinical professor of urology at Brown University, in a letter to Harvard
Pilgrim in August 1996. To Reynolds, who'd been referred to Susset by a doctor
at his HMO, the urologist seemed to be suggesting that his impotence was
somehow related to his sexual orientation, "but I never brought homosexuality
up as a negative in my sexual functioning," he says.
What's more, Reynolds says, Susset apparently had come to his conclusions
before he had all the facts. Although Susset failed to respond to repeated
requests for an interview, Reynolds says that "five minutes after I told him I
was gay, he pointed at me and said, `I bet you'll turn out psychogenic.' " And
sure enough, this was Susset's diagnosis.
During the time in which Reynolds was treated by Harvard Pilgrim (from the
early '80s to '90s) there was an increased awareness within the medical
community about the needs of gay and lesbian patients -- partially as a result
of AIDS and the activism that sprung from it. On the other hand, doctors then
also felt increasingly pressured by managed care and spiraling health-care
costs to ration expensive tests and treatments. In Reynolds's case, these two
trends may have worked at cross-purposes.
Indeed, because Harvard Pilgrim could not discuss Reynolds's case due to
doctor-patient confidentiality, it's hard to say whether insensitivity to or
inexperience with gay and lesbian needs, cost concerns, or a combination of
these played into Reynolds's problems with the HMO.
Gay male impotence, after all, is a highly specialized condition. As Reynolds
himself says, most doctors who treat sexual dysfunction deal mostly with
straight, married couples. They are not used to the concept of sex with
anonymous people, or even first-time sexual encounters, so they tend to
prescribe treatments for "people in long-term relationships, those who have a
vested interest in making their sex life work," he says.
In his case, the 40-something Reynolds is unattached and has a difficult
enough time meeting men. Forcing your penis into a tiny rubber ring or sticking
yourself with a needle right before sex isn't exactly an icebreaker. But when
Reynolds mentioned this to his doctors at Harvard Pilgrim, he says, they
refused to recommend other alternatives, such as penile implants or corrective
surgery.
According to most statistics, 10 to 15 percent of all men have some degree of
sexual dysfunction. How many of these men are gay, no one knows for sure.
Nevertheless, the number is thought to be significant enough that several major
publications have run stories on the subject in recent months. In the September
30 issue of the Advocate, a national gay and lesbian magazine, John
Gallagher talks about how many impotent gay men suffer in silence, particularly
in front of straight doctors, while POZ magazine published a piece last
month about impotence among the HIV-positive, who are prone to low testosterone
levels.
In both stories and like Reynolds himself, men complained about how certain
attitudes within the medical community had kept them from getting the treatment
they needed, either because a doctor was squeamish about discussing gay sex or
because of what POZ describes as the "phobic fallout of HIV."
Dr. Judith Rabkin, a leading researcher at Columbia University who works with
people with AIDS, says some urologists believe that treating HIV-positive men
for impotence is not only a waste of time but unethical. One colleague actually
likened the scenario to "giving Typhoid Mary a job as a cook," she says.
Dr. Mark Litwin, an openly gay urologist and an assistant professor of urology
and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles, also has seen
his share of homophobia within the medical community. Because of this, "I've
spent a lot of time teaching the art of patient/doctor communication," says
Litwin -- "sensitizing" his colleagues to the needs of the gay community.
According to Litwin, the causes of gay men's erection problems are no
different than those of heterosexuals' -- depression, an anxiety disorder,
increased stress, a physical condition, etc. "But where it can be socially more
touchy," he says, "is when a gay patient starts talking to his doctor about sex
with his lover, his boyfriend, or even his trick, for that matter."
And it's not just touchy for doctors. Gay men, Litwin says, probably feel more
comfortable talking with gay doctors about such personal issues. To ease their
discomfort, "doctors need to let them know that they won't be judged," says
Litwin. Then they must get to know a patient well enough to recommend
appropriate treatments. "A vacuum pump is really only for those people with
partners who don't need to be impressed or courted," he says.
On the West Coast, Litwin says, doctors are gradually coming around to this
more enlightened way of thinking. But according to Eric Mathewson*, Rhode
Island's medical community is still in the dark ages when it comes to treating
gay and lesbian patients. In his search for a cure for his sexual dysfunction,
Mathewson has endured a steady stream of homophobia over the years, he says.
One doctor went so far as to say that Mathewson's impotence was "a sign from
God that I should go the other way," he says; another said it was a blessing in
disguise, because it "kept me from getting AIDS."
But in reality, Mathewson's sexual dysfunction almost cost him his life.
Desperate to find the person who could arouse him, "I used to have one
one-night stand after another," he says, "and I'd get really drunk beforehand
so that if things didn't work out, I could blame it on the alcohol."
Even worse, because he couldn't get an erection, Mathewson was usually the
recipient during anal intercourse, which (contrary to what his doctor said) put
him at grave risk for contracting HIV. Mathewson says he also has tried
autoerotism, an extremely dangerous form of self-strangulation used for sexual
stimulation. Today, he wonders how many other men have gone to such
life-threatening extremes to achieve satisfaction.
Sitting in Reynolds's cozy living room on the East Side of Providence,
Mathewson and Reynolds nod sympathetically at the other's every comment. It is
not often they get to talk so openly about their sexual problems. Indeed, the
pair share a secret that most of their other friends don't know about. Because
the stigma of impotence is so powerful within the gay community, Mathewson and
Reynolds keep quiet for the most part.
At first glance, this stigma might seem unusual for a community known for
being open about discussing sex, but Litwin says this is precisely the point.
"I hate to define the gay community by sexuality, but we obviously place a high
value on sexual expression," he says. Impotence, then, "can make a person feel
really depressed."
Mathewson goes even further in explaining the dilemma. "The gay community is
very sex-oriented. It's almost a caricature of itself," he says. In gay porn,
for instance, potency is emphasized above everything else.
As an example, Mathewson mentions Video Expo in Providence. Along with the
usual array of X-rated videos and magazines, the store sells all kinds of
phallic and penis-enhancing devices, including cheaper, more commercial
versions of the vacuum pump.
The way it works, a man places his penis inside a plastic cylinder, pumps
blood into it, and then puts a tension ring around the base to maintain an
erection. At Video Expo, customers can choose among the "Blue Veiner," the
"Plunger Pump," and the "Stallion Pumper," whose suction produces "BIGGER,
HARDER, STRONGER results!"
Hanging from the wall in the store are so-called "cock rings," similar to the
medically prescribed tension rings. At the counter are bottles of "Video Head
Cleaner," an inhalant that supposedly increases your blood pressure -- and thus
your chances of getting a hard-on.
Litwin says that mentioning impotence in such a sexually charged environment
would be like mentioning it in a locker room full of football players -- it
strikes at the core of male insecurity. But despite the silence, Mathewson and
Reynolds say, they suspect that several of their friends suffer from sexual
dysfunction.
"They're what you'd call `cock-teasers,' people who lead someone on but not to
the point of intimacy," says Reynolds. Then there was the friend who became a
priest -- Mathewson and Reynolds are fairly certain he did it to avoid his
sexual problems.
Compounding the issue even more is the fact that some men discover their
impotence around the same time they discover that they're gay. Occasionally,
the two are related, but either way, it can double the shame and confusion.
"Sexuality issues may revolve around being out or not," says Litwin.
"Particularly for young men, deep-seated guilt may lead to erection
problems."
Reynolds says that at first, "I thought everybody was like this [impotent].
Then, as I became more sexually active, I thought I was just nervous."
Confused over their reaction, even as to whether it was normal, Reynolds and
Mathewson bluffed their way through one sexual encounter after another. For
Mathewson, it didn't work. "I have never been able to keep a guy interested in
me for more than a week," he says.
But Reynolds says that because he could at least get an erection sometimes, he
managed to make it through one long-term relationship. Still, he spent most of
his time trying to avoid intimate moments. And when he did find himself
cornered by his lover, Reynolds would panic and latch on to whatever he could
to explain his inability to maintain an erection. "I'd blame it . . . on the
fact that my lover was getting old," he says.
Like Mathewson, Reynolds also abused alcohol, which can be a significant
contributor to impotence. Reynolds told his partner this as well -- even though
Reynolds's tests showed that his liver functions were normal.
Frantic to find something that would help, Reynolds turned to pornography --
and soon was addicted. "I kept needing a stronger and stronger image to get
aroused," he says. Finally, after five years of this, Reynolds and his
boyfriend split up. This was just the beginning, though, of Reynolds's
problems.
Leonard Reynolds still remembers the first time he mentioned his
impotence to a doctor at Harvard Pilgrim in 1981. "I actually referred to it as
`sexual anxiety,' " he says. Unable to label his problem -- or to even explain
it to friends -- Reynolds says he was particularly sensitive to what he
describes as the "medical homophobia" that followed.
When asked about this, Jane Bruno, manager of public affairs for Harvard
Pilgrim, repeats that doctors are not allowed to comment on specific cases.
Still, she does say that she was surprised by Reynolds's discrimination
complaint against the HMO with the Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and
Discipline.
Harvard Pilgrim is "committed to meeting the needs of diverse populations,"
says Bruno. "We strive to provide high-quality, culturally sensitive care to
all our [patients]." The HMO, for instance, was one of the first companies in
Rhode Island to provide health coverage for same-sex couples, she says, and
every year it participates in the state's Gay Pride parade.
Given the surge of malpractice suits in recent years, Bruno's reluctance to
get into the specifics of Reynolds's case is understandable. What's puzzling,
though, is the institution's reticence to discuss the issues surrounding the
case, such as the HMO's alleged lack of experience in dealing with gay men's
sexual dysfunction or the possibility of homophobia among its staff.
Dr. Thomas Platt, Harvard Pilgrim's director, was asked to be interviewed for
this story, but like the doctors who treated Reynolds, he let Bruno do the
talking for him. Clearly, cases like this touch a nerve.
As Reynolds says, it's one thing to acknowledge gay patients -- it's another
to become actively involved in their sex lives as their urologist. Many more
boundaries must be crossed by both patient and doctor; stereotypes must be
shattered, or the prognosis won't be good.
Reynolds says that initially, doctors suggested counseling for his sexual
problems, and over the following ten years or so, he took their advice. Then,
in the early '90s, Reynolds embarked on a massive research project on the
origins of impotence. Stacks of medical textbooks later, he began to think his
problems were physiological, he says.
Several times he requested to see a urologist at the HMO, but it wasn't until
January 1995 that Reynolds was referred to Harvard Pilgrim's Dr. Alan Rote.
According to Reynolds's medical records, Rote recommended Yocon, an
FDA-approved aphrodisiac. But after trying it for a year, Reynolds decided it
wasn't for him. "All it did was increase my interest in sex," he says. "It made
it easier to obtain an erection, but it was still difficult sustaining it."
Suspecting he suffered from a leaky vein in his penis, Reynolds says that it
"was like putting air in a leaky tire."
Eventually, Reynolds became more adamant about exploring the possibility of
surgery, but he says that Rote remained just as adamant that this was not a
viable option. Deeming the corrective surgery "experimental," the urologist
told Reynolds that the vacuum pump and self-injection therapy were "the options
that were available for treatment," according to Reynolds's medical records.
Frustrated with the recommendation -- and what it meant for his sex life --
Reynolds complained to Platt, Harvard Pilgrim's director. Reynolds says he
asked Platt to allow him to see a doctor in Boston named Irwin Goldstein. A
professor of urology at Boston University Medical Center, Goldstein is world-renowned
for treating sexual dysfunction.
But instead of sending Reynolds to Boston, Platt referred him to a colleague
of Rote's at the HMO, Dr. Alan Podis. Podis then referred Reynolds out of the
network, to Susset in Providence.
According to Reynolds's medical records, Susset did perform some of the tests
necessary to rule out physiological causes, including a so-called "rigi scan."
Working almost like an electrocardiogram, the test required Reynolds to wear a
cuff around his penis, so Susset could record the number of erections he had
while sleeping. Over the course of three nights, the test showed that Reynolds
had one erection that lasted 20 minutes.
To Susset, these results diminished the possibility of a physical problem by
ruling out a "venous leakage." His conclusion, however, clashed with Reynolds's
extensive reading on the subject -- one erection in three nights is hardly
normal, he thought.
Reynolds was even more troubled by the fact that Susset based much of his
diagnosis on another test -- a psychological exam that Susset himself, in his
letter to Podis, described as geared toward heterosexuals. "They asked me
questions like whether I was afraid to have sex with a pregnant woman," says
Reynolds, "and how many times I'd had sex with a woman." To the latter, of
course, Reynolds answered "never."
And based on such answers, Susset wrote that Reynolds "has `0' as far as
[sexual] experience" and that "his gender definition is terrible." Thanking
Podis for his "kind referral," Susset concluded by saying, "as . . . suspected,
his problem is purely psychological. Psychotherapy may not get very far with
this type of individual, but it certainly could be tried."
Only when Reynolds switched HMOs in January 1997 did he finally get referred
to Goldstein, he says. And much to Reynolds's relief, Goldstein concluded that
Reynolds's problems were indeed physiological. It wasn't a vein, however, but
an artery causing the problem.
How did Goldstein figure this out? According to Reynolds, he ran a series of
invasive diagnostic tests that Harvard Pilgrim had for years been reluctant to
recommend. "He put probes right in the penis. What they determined was that . .
. there were blockages in the arteries," says Reynolds. Almost immediately
afterward, Goldstein recommended penile revascularization surgery.
In a final irony, Harvard Pilgrim did finally approve of Reynolds's visiting
Goldstein -- but only after he'd committed to switching HMOs, he says. Even for
Reynolds, it's hard to say whether the two events are related, but today, as he
waits to be scheduled for surgery, he can't help but wonder.
Would things have been different had he told his doctors that he was a
straight man with a steady girlfriend? Or were the doctors, in recommending the
vacuum pump and injections over surgery, more concerned with cost than his
sexual orientation? Gay men, after all, are not the only ones who have problems
with HMOs. In an age where containing health-care costs is a national priority,
there is an ongoing debate over how the medical community doles out care -- and
over how it reaches its decisions.
Still, if this was a case of managed care at work, the irony is that
Reynolds's doctors probably would've saved more money if they'd sprung for the
expensive tests in the first place rather than spreading Reynolds's treatment
out over 15 years. Now one step closer to a possible cure, Reynolds can only
hope that his frustration and humiliation will soon be over.
Jody Ericson can be reached at jericson[a]phx.com.