To give or not to give
Overcoming the fears and myths of organ donation
by Richard P. Morin
LAWRENCE BENTO
|
Like thousands of others waiting for organ transplants in the US today,
Cranston resident Lawrence Bento anticipates a phone call that may never come.
Bento needs a new kidney. Both of his stopped working three years ago, and
since then, he has undergone dialysis four times a day to clean his body of
deadly toxins.
But more painful and exhausting than dialysis is the wait for a new kidney,
says Bento. Because of a shortage of donated organs in New England, the
42-year-old computer programmer and father of two has been on an
organ-transplant waiting list for three years -- first in Hartford,
Connecticut, and now here in Providence at the recently opened
kidney-transplant center at Rhode Island Hospital.
In New England, kidney-transplant candidates such as Bento (130 in Rhode
Island alone) wait up to 1400 days for a compatible donated kidney, which is
twice the national average. As a result, says Bento, "it can be tough knowing
that the phone call you've been waiting and praying for might never come."
Part of the problem is that although national and regional surveys show
widespread support for organ donation, Rhode Islanders and the rest of the
nation remain reluctant to give up their own organs or a deceased loved one's.
And this makes for a cruel equation for organ-recipient candidates. In the US
there were some 2500 organ donors last year, while the number needed to meet
the nation's present demand is estimated to be between 10,000 and 15,000. On a
regional level, there were 194 organ donors in New England last year; in Rhode
Island, a mere 27, which, encouragingly enough, was almost twice the previous
year's total.
Much of the apprehension surrounding organ and tissue donation in Rhode Island
and elsewhere is a result of misconceptions and myths, say medical
professionals and regional organ bank officials. These myths range from the
fear that organ donors will receive inferior medical treatment to the
misconception that surviving family members will be responsible for the cost of
the procurement of donated organs from deceased loved ones.
"People need to get the proper facts, and people need to start thinking of
organ donation as people helping people, instead of getting caught up in the
myths," says Karen Libutti, hospital coordinator for the Rhode Island office of
the New England Organ Bank (NEOB).
Unfortunately, the best weapon against these untruths is organ-donation
education, which is scattershot at best in Rhode Island. Although federal and
state governments have done much to educate Americans about their health in
recent years, efforts to provide the public with information about organ
donation and transplantation pale in comparison to HIV/AIDS and breast and
prostate cancer public-awareness campaigns.
In Rhode Island, there are no formal state programs beyond an outreach
initiative at the Registry of Motor Vehicles to educate the public about organ
donation and transplantation. To pick up the slack, grass-roots organizations
formed by transplants recipients, such as the Rhode Island Organ Donor
Awareness Coalition (RIODAC) and the state branch of the Transplant Recipient
International Organization (TRIO), "are substituting the best we can with the
limited capacity we have for what could be the role of government," says Dr.
Augustino Zabbo, a heart-transplant recipient and the head of RIODAC.
Ultimately, then, the job of education falls to a small, core group of
volunteers, who struggle to push forward a unified agenda. "I often feel like
an ambassador for organ donation and transplantation," says Florence Browning,
a kidney-transplant recipient who heads TRIO, which is based at South County
Hospital. "People are generally open to receiving information about organ
donation and transplantation, but I am always amazed at how little they
know."
Betsey Strock, director of public education for the NEOB, agrees. "National
surveys show that people say they support the idea of becoming an organ donor,
but those numbers don't match up with those who actually do," she says. "I
believe many people think it is a complicated process, like making out a will,
when in fact it is not. All people need to do is register as an organ donor and
make their family aware of their wish to be an organ donor."
Not that groups like RIODAC haven't made significant progress over the years.
Prior to joining the Coalition on Donation, a national organ-donation promotion
group, RIODAC was a grass-roots organization working to educate Rhode Islanders
one person at a time. But in recent years, RIODAC's efforts have become larger
in scope. They now sponsor a statewide organ-donation poster contest for high
school children, while members of their speakers bureau address community and
corporate groups.
Still, outside of these efforts, the first place Rhode Islanders are likely to
hear about becoming an organ donor is at the Registry of Motor Vehicles in
Pawtucket. Although it has been a longstanding practice for registries
nationwide to broach the subject of organ donation when people apply for or
renew a license, there is some debate within the organ-donation procurement and
education community over whether these registries are the best place for this.
"I think the registry is a good place for information about organ donation, but
a bad place to make a decision," says Strock.
To ease people into it more gently, RIODAC has worked closely with the Rhode
Island Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to enact more comprehensive practices
and procedures for asking Ocean Staters if they would like to become an organ
donor. RIODAC is also creating information pamphlets to be placed at the
registry, so Rhode Islanders can make more informed choices.
The NEOB, which is designated by the federal government to handle organ
procurement in New England, has added public education to their list of
activities as well. Today, the organization runs two sets of television
advertisements in Rhode Island and across the region each year to urge people
to consider becoming an organ donor. The ads, says Strock, appear to be quite
effective -- the number of calls for information about organ donation
skyrockets by more than 1000 percent in the weeks following the air dates.
"In the beginning of organ donation, which is a young field, we were trying to
do the best possible job with the actual recovery of organs," says Strock. "It
is a fairly recent development for organ banks to think they can provide
information that will help people make more informed decisions about becoming
an organ donor."
RICHARD FORBES
|
Now the NEOB even trains people, many of whom are transplant recipients or
families who have donated organs from deceased loved ones, to speak with
community groups about issues surrounding organ donation. In Rhode Island,
Richard Forbes, who received a liver transplant three years ago, is one such
person working with the public to dispel myths and misconceptions about organ
donation.
"I think people really don't think seriously about the issue of organ donation
until they, or someone they know, is faced with a transplant or has received
one," he says. After Forbes received his liver transplant, for instance, many
of his neighbors in Warwick became organ donors.
"I can understand the trepidation people have about becoming an organ donor.
Before I went through all this, I thought the idea of becoming an organ donor
was yucky, too," says Forbes. "But those thoughts are really irrational when
you sit down and think about it. Why take your organs with you when you die,
when you can help someone to live?"
A former actor, Forbes, who entered a masters degree program in social work at
Rhode Island College this semester, is now focusing his life's work on helping
others and improving organ-donation awareness. "My life has taken on new
meaning," he says. "If I can get just one person to become an organ donor, I
will feel as if I have accomplished something."
People like Forbes, says Dr. Paul Morrissey, a kidney-transplant surgeon at
Rhode Island Hospital, are part of the solution to recruiting the federal and
state governments in organ-donation outreach. "The more success stories [of
people getting transplants] receiving public attention, the more involved
they've [the federal government] become in public education," says Morrissey.
In fact, the federal government has already taken a step in the right
direction, sending out organ-donation information and cards to 70 million
Americans last year as part of their tax refunds.
The other key to organ-donor awareness, of course, lies with the very people
who perform and aid in organ transplants. Libutti says that before she could
focus her attention on raising public knowledge about organ donation in Rhode
Island, she had to work with the state's hospital-based doctors and nurses to
convince some of them of the significance of the procedure.
"It has gotten a lot better," says Libutti of the willingness of doctors and
nurses to call the NEOB when a patient appears to be a suitable organ donor. "A
lot of the education is getting doctors to see beyond death." It is also
teaching them how to help others overcome inherent biases against organ
donation.
National statistics show that close to half of the families who are approached
about organ donation decline to contribute their deceased loved one's organs.
Many of them cite the common myths surrounding organ donation -- doctors
disfiguring the deceased, family members paying for organ procurement, and the
organs going only to the rich and connected -- as reasons.
"But these excuses are just that -- excuses," says Libutti. "There is not
truth to any of them. The [organ procurement] procedure is no more disfiguring
than what is done to the body when it is embalmed. The New England Organ Bank
and the recipient's insurance company pay for the operation, not the family of
the organ donor."
Religious beliefs are also often cited as a reason why people choose not to
donate, even though most major religions, including the Catholic Church,
support organ donation. "And those that don't support it leave it up to the
individual," says Libutti. She notes that even Pope John Paul II has publicly
endorsed organ donation, which should have had a significant impact on the
overwhelmingly Catholic state of Rhode Island.
A final obstacle to approaching a family about organ donation has to do with
the traumatic circumstances under which such a request is likely to occur.
"You're meeting families in the absolute worst situation -- they have just lost
a loved one," says Libutti.
To counter this, she has learned how to concentrate on the good that can come
from organ donation. "I am trying to make families understand that something
positive can come from a tragedy. And for many people, that can be of great
comfort when they have just lost someone they love."
Still, if there is any disagreement within a family as to whether a deceased
individual should be an organ donor, the NEOB makes it a practice not to push
for organ donation. They do so not only out of consideration for the surviving
family members but for the sake of good public relations. "The American public
is already skittish enough about organ donation as it is. We cannot afford
negative press," says Libutti.
Indeed, after 60 Minutes aired a segment recently asserting that
doctors take organs from people who aren't dead yet, the number of donations
dipped nationwide.
But the media can have a positive impact as well. In Rhode Island, when
popular television reporter Jim Taricani of WJAR-Channel 10 needed a heart
transplant, reports on his plight fueled public interest in organ donation. And
television and newspaper reports on the newly opened kidney-transplant center
at Rhode Island Hospital have helped increase public awareness as well, Libutti
says.
In fact, although the kidney-transplant center, which performed its first
transplant in March, was scheduled to perform 12 transplants in its first year,
it performed 18 in its first four months. The transplant program, the only one
of its kind in Rhode Island, is booked through the fall with living-donor
kidney transplants.
The new transplant center was certainly a blessing for 27-year-old Kevin Smith
of Cranston. After a viral infection damaged his kidneys and necessitated a
transplant, Smith stayed on an organ transplant waiting list for three years.
Each month, he traveled to Boston (where more than half of all Rhode Islanders
used to receive treatment and kidney transplants before Rhode Island Hospital
opened its own program) to check the status of his name on the list. And each
month his name slowly rose higher on the list.
While Smith waited, he grew sicker. His dialysis treatments three times a week
debilitated him to the point where climbing stairs was next to impossible.
Smith was also forced to abandon his studies at Northeastern University in
Boston because of the progression of his illness.
A phone call from Rhode Island Hospital's transplant center, however, changed
all that for Smith, one of the first two recipients of a kidney transplant
here. "Getting my transplant so close to home was great. I really wish I knew
the family who donated my kidney. Without them, I wouldn't be here today," says
Smith. Today, he plans to return to Northeastern University to finish his
degree in audio engineering.
As for Bento, until a kidney matching his body type becomes available, he goes
about his job and raising his two teenage daughters, a task made all the harder
with the passing of his wife last year. "I had a couple phone calls, when I was
on the list in Hartford, saying they had found a match for me. But just as we
were heading out the door, they called back and said that it wasn't as good of
a match as they first hoped," he says. "But if people would just sign those
organ-donor cards and tell their families, people like me could be helped so
much quicker. Becoming an organ donor is the most noble thing one can do."