Killer angel
Tom Hanks takes the high Road to Perdition
BY PETER KEOUGH
Road to Perdition. Directed by Sam Mendes. Written by David Self from the graphic novel by Max
Allan Collins and Richard Piers Rayner. With Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, Tyler
Hoechlin, Daniel Craig, Jude Law, Stanley Tucci, Jennifer Jason Leigh, and Liam
Aiken. A DreamWorks Pictures release. At the Apple Valley, Entertainment, Flagship, Hoyts, Opera House, and Showcase cinemas.
Tom Hanks makes for an uncomfortable John Wayne. Or is it Jimmy Stewart? He's
the closest we've got these days to a Hollywood icon that embodies
righteousness, decency, and the American Way. The youngest person to receive an
AFI Life Achievement Award, he looked a little awkward balancing Bosom
Buddies and Bachelor Party with his sanctimonious do-gooder roles in
Apollo 13, Philadelphia, and Forrest Gump, not to mention
the Greatest Generation idolatry of Saving Private Ryan.
So before he starts pitching War Bonds, maybe it's time for a change of image
(Cast Away came close to it, though nobody cared). How about playing a
sympathetic serial killer? (Or did he already do that in Private Ryan?)
Sam Mendes follows up his Oscar-winning debut, American Beauty with an
adaptation of Max Allan Collins's cult-favorite 1998 graphic novel Road to
Perdition in which Hanks plays Michael Sullivan, a hit man for a local
chapter of the Capone mob run by lovable old sod John Rooney (Paul Newman, with
an errant accent), Michael's benefactor and father figure. Michael's own
12-year-old son, Michael Jr. (newcomer Tyler Hoechlin), meanwhile, is curious
about what dad does for a living. He ends up peeking at a different kind of
primal scene; that leads to the killing of Sullivan's wife (a short-lived
Jennifer Jason Leigh) and his younger son. The killer turns out to be John
Rooney's real son, the dissipated and treacherous Connor (Daniel Craig). After
some subdued bloodletting, Michael and son must hit the road to Perdition,
Michigan, where the boy can find refuge with a handy aunt while dad heads out
unfettered to make things right.
In the original book, the names are O'Sullivan and Looney. Those aren't the
only changes. O'Sullivan is nicknamed the "Angel of Death" for his remorseless
efficiency, and he operates like Clint Eastwood at the end of
Unforgiven, except with a kid tagging along. The book is like The
Pilgrim's Progress in reverse. Hanks's Michael is more like the dad in
Sleepless in Seattle, except heavily armed. Taking Meg Ryan's place
here, perhaps, is Jude Law, himself apparently trying to alter his image from
that of the Brit pretty boy. Got up like a deranged Stan Laurel with funky
teeth, he puts on the film's best performance as Maguire, who's hired by Capone
lieutenant Frank Nitti (Stanley Tucci) to take out Michael. A Weegee-like crime
photographer gone over to the other side, Maguire is one of screenwriter David
Self's more inspired inventions, a link between the worlds of voyeurism and
action, a theme that also figures in American Beauty.
Call it American Ugly. Although the Newman-Hanks match-up in the film is
what's being hyped, the most compelling tête-à-tête is an
eerie confrontation between Michael and Maguire in a diner. Its evocation of
Edward Hopper's Nighthawks underscores the influence of cinematographer
Conrad Hall (some say he was the real director of Beauty), who eschews
the noirish and startling Richard Piers Rayner artwork of the original book and
instead takes an art-history approach to the imagery, with tableaux reminiscent
of Thomas Eakins, Andrew Wyeth, Edward Hopper, and photographer Walker Evans.
Mendes also seems to have organized his film visually rather than in narrative
or dramatic terms. The whole pseudo-Dostoyevskian, pseudo-Biblical rigmarole of
fathers and sons, loyalty and treachery, with its Hanks-friendly, family-values
copout resolution, offers none of the punch or clarity of a single shot of a
hall full of weary, monochromatic men sitting in rows, each reading a newspaper
(talk about being black and white and read all over). Or the sinister,
insidious appearances of coins as an emblem of death, or the inescapable
doppelgänger of mirrors, or the soothing presence of water in various
forms as a teasing promise of life, redemption, and release.
This last motif surges in the film's coda with a sequence that is 2002's most
rapturous, a long, undulating shot that combines serenity and horror. As
depressing as the film's relentless darkness (and this may be one of the
darkest summer movies of all time) might have been, the light suffusing this
scene is even more disturbing. When he reaches the end of Road to
Perdition, Tom Hanks may not have changed his image, but this image could
well change him.
Touch of evil
So how can Tom Hanks, America's poster child for decency and family values,
play a serial killer? As Michael Sullivan in Sam Mendes's Road to
Perdition, he's an efficient, remorseless hit man for a 1930s Chicago-based
mob.
Yet as Hanks points out, it's not as if it were his first time. "I mean, when I
did The Green Mile, I said, 'Look, I play an executioner.' 'Yeah [he
imagines by way of response], but you're a really nice executioner.' 'Okay, all
right. So now, I kill like 15 people in this movie.' 'Yeah, but you do it for
really good reasons.' I said, 'All right, all right, I guess I do.' "
Then there's Saving Private Ryan, where he kills far more people for all
the right reasons.
"And that's also a story about the rationale, how you get from one place to the
next, how do you get to this place where your life has been completely altered
by whatever circumstances. You've been able to rationalize everything. And you
realize in a moment that this rationale does not hold in the brave new world
that you suddenly find yourself in.
"More than anything else, Michael suddenly realizes, 'Everything I constructed
in order to protect myself and my family has fallen by the wayside in a
moment's notice, so everything was a lie up to that. The house, the marriage,
the kids, everything was a friggin' lie.' Look at the family, look at that
house that he's protecting. He doesn't come home and play ball with the kids or
anything. That is the darkest, scariest, most dysfunctional house you've ever
seen. This is the thing that he's gonna go off and you, know, seek retribution
for? Now that's neither a good guy nor a bad guy, that's just a human being
that's in the middle of something that's much bigger than he ever planned
on."
Yikes. A "friggin' lie?" Whatever happened to the guy making speeches praising
the Greatest Generation? He certainly wasn't the person Sam Mendes, whose
American Beauty was hardly a Hallmark greeting card for American family
values, was looking for when he cast the movie.
"It's a risk casting anyone against type or away from what they're known to
do," Mendes acknowledges. "But you know, there's one thing better than having a
great actor; it's having a great actor who's never done what you're asking him
to do before, and he's hungry to get out of the trailer every day and hungry to
try something new, to test himself.
"Actors get pigeonholed very quickly, particularly movie actors -- in the
theater one is much more used to casting people against type and trusting that
their talent and skill will get them through. But Tom has something else if you
look at his early films, particularly Punchline or Philadelphia,
there's a lot of rage in there, and a lot of darkness, and it stands next to
him. He's so brilliant at relaxing everyone and coming up with a wisecrack and
being funny and witty and all of those things, but when you do a movie with
him, you're aware that there's a kind of shadow Tom that stands next to him all
the time. That he steps into when he acts. And that's the one that I was trying
to access."
Hanks acknowledges that angry streak, and he uses it as a way of getting an
insight into "evil." "I would never see myself robbing banks, but I could see
myself being very angry, and, you know, wanting to rob. They [the characters I
play] don't have to be me, but I have to understand their motivations. There's
a lot of opportunity to play the villain with the capital 'V.' This villain
doesn't exist. It's like a James Bond villain. 'Before I kill you, Mr. Bond,
perhaps you'd enjoy a tour of my installation.' The idea of world dominance,
or, you know, I want to be the biggest cocaine dealer, I don't get it. But
where motivation is involved, then I can see myself wanting to do that sort of
thing."
Will audiences in this post-September 11 world of polarized good and evil
appreciate this kind of moral searching and ambiguity, especially during the
escapist summer-movie season? Will they embrace a film that seems ambivalent
about American and family values?
"I don't think it's a negative look at America," Mendes counters. "I think it's
about America, and it's about human beings, and it's a universal story. People
are capable of good and bad. And the longer we go on perpetuating these absurd
two-dimensional stories about everything being black and white and you're
either good or bad, the longer we'll misunderstand how many interesting stories
you can tell in the space between the two. That's what this movie attempts to
do. There's no message from it. Except there are many questions asked, and it's
up to people to answer them when they leave the theater."
-- P.K.
Issue Date: July 12 - 18, 2002
|