THE PATH TO WAR
Vets offer mixed views on Bush's battle plan
BY MICHAEL LUKAS
When Gabe Hudson, a recent graduate of Brown University's MFA
program, sent his new book Dear Mr. President to George W. Bush, he
wasn't expecting a reply. But the president -- or one of his staff members --
apparently had the time to read this 155-page collection of short stories,
based on Hudson's experience as a Gulf War-era rifleman in the Marine reserves,
since the author received a letter from Bush a few weeks later calling the book
"ridiculous" and "unpatriotic." Indeed, Hudson's view of the Gulf War is deeply
cynical and surrealist (think Dr. Strangelove and Catch-22) --
certainly not what the president wants to read as he's gearing up for another
war with Iraq.
While Hudson may tend toward leftist politics, his characters span the
political spectrum -- from yoga-practicing Chomsky-reading pacifists and
individualist self-preservationists to rabid right-wing patriots -- as do
real-life veterans. And as much as their political views diverge, so do their
opinions about the possibility of another war in Iraq.
Al Rossi, commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars post 172, a retired
Providence Police Department captain, and Marine Corps corporal, wholeheartedly
supports the commander-in-chief's authority on this matter. "If it needs to be
done, it needs to be done," Rossi says. But he's adamant that his opinions do
not reflect that of the VFW or veterans in general. "We got a lot of guys, with
a lot of different views."
There was healthy disagreement even among the three veterans who sat talking
and playing cards at the VFW post at nine on a recent Thursday morning. "I
think it's a bunch of bullshit," says Vincent Pisanelli, who served with the
Army as a sergeant first class in Korea. "I think we're biting off more than we
can chew. The bureaucrats over there in DC, let them fight the war. The guys
who start the war, let them fight it."
Alfredo Pelliccia, who served in World War II and the beginning of the Korean
War, seconded Pisanelli's non-interventionist stance. "I think the problem is
we've stuck our nose in everyone's business all over the world," Pelliccia
says. "We should let them kill themselves." Later in the discussion, however,
he seemed to support intervention. "When you start something finish it. You
leave it half done and you got a lot of problems." Pelliccia seems to embody
the ambivalence of many veterans who are well-acquainted with the horrors of
war, but also want to support the government and the military.
Retired Marine Corps colonel Stephen M. McCartney, a Gulf War veteran and
police chief in Warwick, takes a wider view on the issue. "It certainly seems
that there has been a lot of debate on both sides of the issue, which is
appropriate for American society."
While Hudson's book may be ridiculous -- his is a war in which chemical gasses
cause a man to grown an ear on his stomach, soldiers wrestle chimpanzees, and
characters have names like Fear Me, Gay Dad, and Help People -- it is not
unpatriotic. In fact, it contributes to a discourse, among veterans and those
unfamiliar with military service, which is the very essence, as McCartney
notes, of our democracy.
Issue Date: October 18 - 24, 2002
|