When he was first elected to the legislature in 1986, state Representative
Antonio Pires (D-Pawtucket) believed strongly in the death penalty. In 1994, as
his proposal for a voter referendum to reinstate capital punishment passed the
House of Representatives before dying in the state Senate, the idea came closer
to becoming law than any similar proposal in the last decade.
Now a candidate for governor, Pires says he would veto any death penalty
legislation passed by the General Assembly if he wins the election. Does this
represent typical two-faced political pandering to liberal Democratic primary
voters? No, it's more like vintage Tony Pires.
People who know the veteran legislator, whether they sat next to him when he
chaired the powerful House Finance Committee or picketed his Pawtucket
insurance agency in outrage over one of his positions on the state budget, use
the same words to describe him: honest, hard-working, and intelligent.
"I don't think he would be capable of [changing his position on the death
penalty] for political reasons," summarizes former state Representative David
Panciera (D-Westerly), who served on the Finance Committee with Pires from 1993
to 1998 and supports his gubernatorial bid. "He was the best thing I saw about
state government," Panciera adds.
State Representative Charles Levesque (D-Portsmouth), a supporter of Myrth
York's rival gubernatorial campaign, says Pires is "easily one of the most
honorable, decent people I worked with at the State House."
"He was accessible and honest," adds anti-poverty activist and sometime Pires
picketer Henry Shelton, "and that isn't always the case with politicians."
Amplifying these qualities in his uphill race against two-time Democratic
gubernatorial nominee York and Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse, Pires has
the advantage of a traditional Democratic Party heritage. His parents were
Portuguese immigrants who worked in a textile mill and on construction sites
after settling in Rhode Island. Running against the daughter of a New Jersey
factory owner and the son of a diplomat and CIA agent, Pires can emphasize his
rise from humble origins.
Whitehouse and York have better name recognition and the ability to raise
greater sums of money -- vital factors in any campaign. But in an early
indication of pluck, Pires's campaign scored a coup by organizing a barebones
hot dog fundraiser in Pawtucket on the same night that Whitehouse was roasted
during a decidedly more lavish event at Lombardi's 1025 Club in Johnston. While
the AG's function was better attended and more lucrative, the two events
received equal play in the next day's Providence Journal and Pires
fortified his regular guy image.
If Pires is identified with one issue, it's cutting the automobile excise tax.
The multi-year phase-out initiated by the lawmaker has eliminated local
property taxes on the first $3500 of a vehicle's value. Faced with state budget
deficits, Governor Lincoln Almond wants to freeze the program at the current
level, rather than letting the amount that can't be taxed rise to $5000 this
year and higher in subsequent years. Continuation of the car tax phase-out has
strong support in the legislature, however, because it provides relief from the
regressive property tax.
Ideologically, Pires is a middle of the road Democrat. He supported the
abolition of General Public Assistance, a welfare program for single adults,
but was instrumental in expanding state-financed health-care for working class
families. He voted for gay rights, modest gun control, a needle exchange
program to prevent AIDS among intravenous drug users, and codifying the
landmark abortion rights case Roe v. Wade in state law. But he also
opposed the repeal of the state's sodomy law, backed a ban on partial-birth
abortion, and supported increasing criminal penalties for participation in
medically assisted suicide.
Myrth York
|
In addition, two of Pires's votes -- for expanding charter schools and against
requiring Providence Place Mall contractors to pay prevailing union scale wages
-- may hurt him with labor households attracted by his blue-collar origins.
"He was open to traditional Democratic concerns for funding," says Panciera,
summarizing the legislator's views, "but those concerns were very much
moderated by the funds at hand or that could be brought to hand."
Pires has become more liberal as time has passed, adds Levesque, but not
liberal enough to merit his backing.
PIRES'S REPUTATION as a smart, thoughtful, and honest person may prove to be
his greatest asset as a gubernatorial candidate.
While other politicians might try to forget their changes on major issues like
the death penalty, he cites his conversion as one of his proudest legislative
accomplishments because it indicates, "the type of person I am."
Pires says he extensively researched the issue before making the change. He
looked at extenuating circumstances and aggravating conditions. He read Victor
Hugo's The Last Day of a Condemned Man. He listened to advocates on both
sides. And he tried to craft legislation that guaranteed Rhode Island would
never make the mistake of putting an innocent man to death, as was the case
with its last execution in 1845.
But no matter how he wrote the bill, he says, it always had one great flaw --
"unequal application to minorities and people of low economic means" -- that
couldn't be corrected without a change in human nature. Such discrimination
against blacks, Hispanics, and the poor, Pires concluded, was "ultimately
contrary to my fundamental belief that everyone should be treated equally." So
today, he calls his earlier death penalty advocacy "misplaced."
Shelton, who is neutral in the gubernatorial race, cites another issue where
Pires changed his mind -- the school breakfast program. For years, Shelton
campaigned for the legislature to require local communities to provide students
with a federally funded school breakfast. Pires's own Pawtucket School
Committee, however, opposed the program as an unnecessary transfer of a basic
parental responsibility to the schools. And Pires initially agreed that the
decision should be made locally, not on Smith Hill.
But after several years of Shelton's lobbying, Pires had breakfast at
Pawtucket's M. Virginia Cunningham Elementary School, talked with the children
and teachers there, and concluded, "It didn't look like a socialist or
communist conspiracy to me." Changing his mind, he backed legislation that
mandated local school boards to provide breakfast at schools with a large
percentage of low-income children. The scope of the legislation was
subsequently expanded to include all schools.
Sheldon Whitehouse
|
"Adaptability is a sign of intelligence," notes state Representative Paul
Sherlock (D-Warwick), a Pires backer who served as vice chair of the Finance
Committee. Pires, he adds, "was never afraid to work and exhaust all possible
data before [making] a
decision." Because he listens, Shelton believes, Pires is the most likely to
bring issues of the poor and working people into the governor's race. In fact,
when his political career is over, Pires promises to join Shelton in advocating
for the needs of the poor.
The Pawtucket lawmaker became a major power at the State House in 1993, when
he backed John Harwood for speaker. Rhode Island was recovering from two
insider-created fiascos, the credit union crisis and the state pension scandal.
In that atmosphere, Pires says, a clear break with the past was needed, so he
backed Harwood instead of liberal state Representative Russell Bramley of
Warwick, the candidate associated with outgoing Speaker Joseph DeAngelis.
Because he had not been part of Harwood's inner circle, Pires was surprised
when the speaker asked him to chair the House Finance Committee, the
legislature's most powerful committee. He agreed, he says, with the condition
that he would work independently. The decision cost him personally, Pires says,
as he spent less time with his family and renegotiated his insurance business's
partnership agreement to take "an enormous reduction in income." He explains,
"I honestly believed I was making a difference in people's lives."
Pires soon developed a reputation for running fair and democratic hearings.
Panciera and Rodney Driver, another former Finance Committee member, who has
since converted to the Republican Party, recall that Pires voted last to avoid
pressuring other committee members to support his position. Only once did he
try to influence other committee members' votes, Pires recalls: when he lobbied
against Almond's proposal to end cost of living adjustments for teachers'
pensions.
Once the budget cleared the Finance Committee and reached the House floor,
Pires continued to behave democratically, says Levesque, a staunch advocate for
the poor, who has probably offered more budget amendments than any other House
member in recent years. "He always treated any discussion as appropriate,"
Levesque says. "He always had the numbers. He always discussed the down side of
every proposal."
Many House members were disappointed when Harwood removed Pires, after nine
years as Finance Committee chairman, last September. Harwood said he was
concerned that Pires wouldn't have the time to chair the committee and run for
governor, but most people at the State House find more credibility in Pires's
explanation that control of the state budget was the issue.
The independence that Harwood promised to Pires became a problem last year
when the Pawtucket legislator sided with liberals against the speaker on major
environmental and poverty issues. First, Pires opposed funding a multi-million
dollar environmental impact statement needed to begin development of a major
container port at Quonset Point in North Kingstown. He angered Harwood by
supporting an audit of the legislature's own budget. His independence agreement
with Harwood covered 99 percent of the budget, Pires relates, but specifically
excluded the legislature's budget. When revelations about unaudited legislative
spending and dubious expenses sparked controversy, however, Pires says he felt
compelled to support an aggressive audit of State House spending.
He also clashed with the speaker at the end of the session when Harwood tried
to transfer $1 million from a $5 million affordable housing fund to pay for
improvements in state court buildings. In addition, Pires differed with the
speaker over the separation of powers issue, agreeing with Common Cause that
the best system of government provides legislative oversight, not day-to-day
involvement in operations by sitting on the boards of quasi-public agencies.
A minor source of conflict, Pires adds, was state financing for the University
of Rhode Island convocation center. While he supported the gym construction, he
differed with hockey player Harwood over the addition of an ice skating rink to
the project.
THE BEGINNING of Pires's chairmanship was also controversial since he sided
with conservative Democratic governor Bruce Sundlun and Harwood to eliminate
General Public Assistance, a state-funded welfare program for single adults,
some of whom were substance abusers. GPA was eliminated over several years,
including one year in which the cuts financed a reduction of corporate income
taxes. "The worst mistake they ever made," says Shelton, who blames GPA's
demise on Sundlun, not Pires, although he picketed Pires's office at the
time.
Nancy Gewirtz, executive director of Rhode Island College's Poverty Institute,
isn't so forgiving. Careful to note that she is neither for nor against any
candidate, Gewirtz says Pires's Finance Committee had a mixed record on poverty
issues.
On the positive side, in addition to repeal of the car tax, big gains were
made in providing health insurance through the RIte Care program to working
parents and their children, including children in the country illegally. In
1999, the Finance Committee expanded eligibility for the program, adding 43,000
participants to RIte Care, says Christopher Koller, CEO of the Neighborhood
Health Plan of Rhode Island. Rhode Island now has the lowest percentage of
people without health insurance among the 50 states, he says. "There are a
number of people who can take credit for it," notes Koller, who is neutral in
the governor's race, "but Tony is one of the major ones."
Gewirtz also credits Pires with expanding state child care subsidies to
low-income families and establishing the state weatherization program that
provides low-income families with $100 every year to help pay heating bills.
"Where Tony saw a human need," summarizes Sherlock, "he was willing to stick
his neck out."
But not all went well for low-income people during the years of Pires's
leadership of the House Finance Committee. "There was some good stuff done,"
Gewirtz says, "but, boy, we slid back in some other areas." In addition to the
elimination of GPA, she says, family welfare benefits have been frozen without
a cost of living increase for 13 years and the state hasn't hired enough
caseworkers to make the new welfare system work well.
Pires defends his stance on GPA, saying that preserving successful programs,
like RIte Care and the low-income elderly drug program, in a time of huge
budget deficits was "more critical than a program [GPA] with a high level of
apparent abuses." Preserving those programs made the recent expansion of RIte
Care possible, he argues, as well as the addition of more drugs to the elderly
prescription program.
Overall, Gewirtz praises Pires as "a decent, caring human being" who always
listened to advocates, and, unlike some of his fellow legislators, always
respected low-income people when they testified before his committee. The
problem, she says, is too many tax cuts, most of them benefiting the wealthy.
Under Pires's chairmanship, the Finance Committee also endorsed a nine percent
reduction in the state income tax over five years, elimination of the inventory
tax on business, and a phase-out of the capital gains tax on assets held more
than five years, starting in 2007. Special tax cuts for American Power
Conversion in North Kingstown and the banking and software industries were also
approved when Pires was in charge of writing the state budget.
Pires generally defends tax cuts for business as necessary to attract jobs to
Rhode Island, so that low-income people can work themselves out of poverty. The
most recent capital gains tax cut "certainly wasn't my highest priority," he
says, but given political pressure -- led by Almond and Senate Majority Leader
William Irons (D-East Providence) -- to reduce taxes on the wealthy, it was a
better solution than cutting the income tax. Postponing implementation for five
years, he adds, allows discussion of the issue to continue.
Such arguments don't sway Gewirtz, who says there's no evidence that state tax
cuts produce business investment. Better to spend the money to help the people
most in need, she says, concluding, "The heavy focus on tax cuts [under Pires]
has been unfortunate and not good economic development policy."
While it's impossible to credit or blame one legislator for any act of the
150-member Rhode Island General Assembly, Pires's record on the Finance
Committee includes a pragmatic mixture of tax cuts and improvements in social
programs. Perhaps his greatest accomplishment, through hard work, intelligence,
and fairness, is that the once-secretive budget writing process is now
credible.
This, however, is not enough to win an election for governor. Many of those
who praise Pires's abilities and pronounce him a superior candidate to York or
Whitehouse temper their remarks by saying, "but he can't win." To become
governor requires money -- something that York and Whitehouse, but not Pires,
were born with.
Former representative Panciera, however, says this is part of the trade-off
with a candidate like Pires. "A person with his qualities does not start out
with a war chest," Panciera says.
Pires concedes that the system puts great emphasis on the ability to raise
money, but he doesn't criticize Rhode Island's political process. As a kid who
grew up in "a very, very modest neighborhood," in a house with a gravel
backyard, he worked to graduate from Pawtucket West Senior High (now Shea High
School) and earn a degree in business administration from the University of
Rhode Island. "I have been successful in facing challenges and overcoming
obstacles," Pires says. The governor's race is perhaps his most high profile
challenge, he notes, but he plans to attack it with the same combination of
hard work, intelligence, and honesty that has worked for him in the past.
He hopes his campaign will inspire children who live in neighborhoods like the
one where he grew up. Maybe kids from working-class Rhode Island families will
look at him, Pires says, and think, " `If I obey the law and I go to school and
I do things that are expected of me, I can take advantage of the great
opportunities this country offers to me.' "
Issue Date: March 29 - April 4, 2002